In an effort to appeal to the conspiracy theorists out there, Mr Everson has written in today's
Age with some grave concerns about myki. I, like many people, am quite concerned about this new system, however this writer takes it a little bit further by spouting claims without first consulting the large amounts of info out in the public sphere. Let's get stuck right into it then (article in italics, my rants in bold).
Will myki be our new Big Brother?
THE new public transport ticket system for Victoria, myki, will allow you to top up your swipe card account with money. The card will include a user's personal identification information. It will have to be read at the start and end of each journey and will record the time and place and the user's identity.
Correct to a point. Myki offers a voluntary registration, which is handy when cards get lost.
This is not only a ticketing system; it is a passenger-tracking system, almost as pervasive as closed-circuit TV cameras, which at present are not fed to a central point in this state; the new ticket system will be. Tracking trains is a good idea. The difference is that passengers are not railway property.
The whole point of Myki is just that - to track the movements of passengers to better decisions can be made in planning of services. If a tree falls in the forest and nobody hears it, big deal. However, if you've got the tree hooked up to a computer... The claims that passengers are not railway property is lame. Who, at any point in history and aside from this author, has made such a claim?
Will the card be owned by its purchaser or remain the property of the transport operator? Will it be illegal to use another person's card? Will card records be admissible in court? Can such records be demanded by prosecutors? Will security agencies be given access to this passenger-tracking system? Will a legal guardian be able to monitor the movements of a minor using such statements?
Robert Everson, Dandenong
Who cares who owns the card? Especially considering the following statements, that have no impact - tickets, right at this moment in time are not transferable, are admissible in court and I dare say any records can be demanded by prosecutors in court. Yes, they can get to your phone records, Robert! How on earth would a legal guardian gain access to this information? If a serious crime has been committed and it exonerates or implicates the person in the crime, I dare say this information would be granted. I somehow don't think anyone can waltz into Google and discover that their little loved one was actually boarding the 96 at Bourke St at 9:46pm instead of attending their pole dancing lessons.
I simply cannot understand how a letter of such poor research can get printed. The author is wrong on almost every issue. Why The Age would waste column space on this is beyond my comprehension and I feel I must return to my tried and true response to anyone bagging public transport, especially the ill- and under-informed:
If you don't like it, take your money and get inside a taxi. Leave the rest of us alone.
Labels: conspiracy theorists, ignorant morons, melbourne Public transport, Myki, Robert Everson, The Age